Best Make (Integromat) Alternatives in 2026
While Make (Integromat) excels in Visual drag-and-drop canvas handles infinite branching, loops, and JSON arrays, limitations like Steeper learning curve for non-technical users lead many teams to seek alternative options. Below is our side-by-side comparison of the top 5 competitors.
| Feature / Benchmark | Make (Integromat) Freemium | Zapier Freemium | n8n Freemium / Fair-Code | Airtable Freemium | NocoDB Freemium / Open-Source | Baserow Freemium / Open-Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | $9/mo | $19.99/mo | $20/mo (or Free Self-Hosted) | $20/user/mo | $12/user/mo | $5/user/mo |
| User Rating | ★ 4.7 / 5.0 | ★ 4.7 / 5.0 | ★ 4.8 / 5.0 | ★ 4.6 / 5.0 | ★ 4.6 / 5.0 | ★ 4.5 / 5.0 |
| Sprints & Agile Cycles Built-in support for time-boxed sprints, iterations, and agile backlog management. | ✕ Not Native | ✕ Not Native | ✕ Not Native | ✕ Not Native | ✕ Not Native | ✕ Not Native |
| Interactive Kanban Boards Visual drag-and-drop workflow tracking with custom status columns and swimlanes. | ✕ Not Native | ✓ Supported | ✕ Not Native | ✓ Supported | ✓ Supported | ✓ Supported |
| Strategic Roadmaps & Gantt Timeline visualization, project milestone dependencies, and executive portfolio views. | ✕ Not Native | ✕ Not Native | ✕ Not Native | ✓ Supported | ✕ Not Native | ✓ Supported |
| Native Time Tracking In-app timers, billable hours tracking, and detailed timesheet reporting. | ✕ Not Native | ✕ Not Native | ✕ Not Native | ✕ Not Native | ✕ Not Native | ✕ Not Native |
| No-Code Workflow Automations Trigger-based automations to assign tasks, sync statuses, and send notifications. | ✓ Supported | ✓ Supported | ✓ Supported | ✓ Supported | ✓ Supported | ✓ Supported |
| AI Copilot & Smart Triage Generative AI assistance for summarizing issues, auto-labeling, and drafting updates. | ✓ Supported | ✓ Supported | ✓ Supported | ✓ Supported | ✕ Not Native | ✓ Supported |
| Enterprise Security & Governance SOC2 Type II compliance, SAML SSO single sign-on, and granular role permissions. | ✓ Supported | ✓ Supported | ✓ Supported | ✓ Supported | ✓ Supported | ✓ Supported |
| Official Access | Visit Make (Integromat) → | Visit Zapier → | Visit n8n → | Visit Airtable → | Visit NocoDB → | Visit Baserow → |
Individual Competitor Breakdowns
Zapier
The world's largest no-code automation platform connecting 7,000+ web apps with automated triggers, AI actions, Tables, and Interfaces.
Starting Price: $19.99/mo (Freemium)
Top Strength: Unrivaled catalog of 7,000+ native app connectors
n8n
Source-available, AI-native workflow automation platform combining visual node building with custom JavaScript/Python code and LangChain agents.
Starting Price: $20/mo (or Free Self-Hosted) (Freemium / Fair-Code)
Top Strength: Charged per full workflow execution rather than per individual step
Airtable
Low-code relational database engine disguised as an intuitive spreadsheet, empowering operations teams to build custom business software.
Starting Price: $20/user/mo (Freemium)
Top Strength: Powerful relational data modeling with zero SQL knowledge
NocoDB
Open-source platform that turns any existing MySQL, PostgreSQL, or SQL Server database into a collaborative smart spreadsheet.
Starting Price: $12/user/mo (Freemium / Open-Source)
Top Strength: Connects directly to production SQL databases with millions of rows
Baserow
Open-source, self-hostable no-code relational database and application builder designed as a privacy-first alternative to Airtable.
Starting Price: $5/user/mo (Freemium / Open-Source)
Top Strength: No row limits when self-hosted on your own servers
Switching from Make (Integromat) FAQ
How much does Make (Integromat) cost, and is there a free plan?
Make (Integromat) operates on a Freemium pricing model, with paid plans starting at $9/mo. Most plans include a risk-free trial period to test core features before upgrading.
What are the best alternatives to Make (Integromat)?
Top market alternatives to Make (Integromat) in the Workflow Automation & Collaboration space include Zapier, n8n, Airtable, NocoDB, Baserow. The ideal choice depends on your team's workflow, budget, and integration requirements.
What are the primary strengths and limitations of Make (Integromat)?
Key advantages include Visual drag-and-drop canvas handles infinite branching, loops, and JSON arrays and 5x to 10x more cost-effective per operation than Zapier. On the other hand, potential limitations reported by users include Steeper learning curve for non-technical users and Debugging complex JSON iterators requires patience.
Does Make (Integromat) support enterprise-level security and compliance?
Yes, Make (Integromat) includes enterprise-grade governance controls, data encryption, and role-based access controls designed for scaling organizations.