Make (Integromat) vs n8n
In our head-to-head analysis of Make (Integromat) ($9/mo, rated 4.7/5) versus n8n ($20/mo (or Free Self-Hosted), rated 4.8/5), Make (Integromat) delivers dependable standard features for Workflow Automation & Collaboration, while n8n matches core capabilities with competitive pricing starting at $20/mo (or Free Self-Hosted).
| Feature / Benchmark | Make (Integromat) Freemium | n8n Freemium / Fair-Code |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | $9/mo | $20/mo (or Free Self-Hosted) |
| User Rating | ★ 4.7 / 5.0 | ★ 4.8 / 5.0 |
| Sprints & Agile Cycles Built-in support for time-boxed sprints, iterations, and agile backlog management. | ✕ Not Native | ✕ Not Native |
| Interactive Kanban Boards Visual drag-and-drop workflow tracking with custom status columns and swimlanes. | ✕ Not Native | ✕ Not Native |
| Strategic Roadmaps & Gantt Timeline visualization, project milestone dependencies, and executive portfolio views. | ✕ Not Native | ✕ Not Native |
| Native Time Tracking In-app timers, billable hours tracking, and detailed timesheet reporting. | ✕ Not Native | ✕ Not Native |
| No-Code Workflow Automations Trigger-based automations to assign tasks, sync statuses, and send notifications. | ✓ Supported | ✓ Supported |
| AI Copilot & Smart Triage Generative AI assistance for summarizing issues, auto-labeling, and drafting updates. | ✓ Supported | ✓ Supported |
| Enterprise Security & Governance SOC2 Type II compliance, SAML SSO single sign-on, and granular role permissions. | ✓ Supported | ✓ Supported |
| Official Access | Visit Make (Integromat) → | Visit n8n → |
Make (Integromat) Detailed Assessment
What We Like (Pros)
- Visual drag-and-drop canvas handles infinite branching, loops, and JSON arrays
- 5x to 10x more cost-effective per operation than Zapier
- Full raw HTTP request and webhook control
Key Limitations (Cons)
- Steeper learning curve for non-technical users
- Debugging complex JSON iterators requires patience
- Slightly smaller long-tail app catalog than Zapier
n8n Detailed Assessment
What We Like (Pros)
- Charged per full workflow execution rather than per individual step
- Native LangChain AI agent nodes, vector store connectors, and code blocks
- Free self-hosted community edition via Docker
Key Limitations (Cons)
- Built for developers and technical ops rather than casual beginners
- Smaller native connector count (though HTTP node connects to anything)
- Self-hosting requires server management
Choosing Between Make (Integromat) and n8n
Which is more cost-effective: Make (Integromat) or n8n?
Make (Integromat) starts at an entry rate of $9/mo (Freemium), whereas Make (Integromat) begins at $9/mo. For teams prioritizing lean software budgets, Make (Integromat) provides an accessible starting point.
How do Make (Integromat) and n8n compare in verified user ratings?
n8n holds the edge with a verified rating of 4.8/5.0, praised especially for Charged per full workflow execution rather than per individual step. Meanwhile, Make (Integromat) scores 4.7/5.0.
When should you choose Make (Integromat) over n8n?
Choose Make (Integromat) if your priority is Visual drag-and-drop canvas handles infinite branching, loops, and JSON arrays within Workflow Automation & Collaboration. Opt for n8n if you require Charged per full workflow execution rather than per individual step and $20/mo (or Free Self-Hosted) pricing.